Common Sense: The Essential Counterbalance to Blind Faith

Introduction

In a world inundated with information, ideologies, and influences, the interplay between common sense and blind faith has never been more critical. Common sense, often described as the practical wisdom derived from everyday experiences and shared human understanding, serves as a grounding force in decision-making. It is the intuitive ability to judge situations based on observable realities, logic, and accumulated knowledge, without the need for specialized expertise. Blind faith, on the other hand, represents an unquestioning acceptance of beliefs, doctrines, or assertions without empirical evidence or critical scrutiny. This can stem from religious convictions, cultural norms, or even modern misinformation campaigns, where adherence is prioritized over verification.

The tension between these two concepts is not new. In 1776, Thomas Paine published Common Sense, a revolutionary pamphlet that ignited the American colonists’ push for independence from Britain. Paine’s work was a masterful appeal to rational thought, dismantling the divine right of kings and hereditary rule through straightforward arguments that resonated with the average person. He argued that government should be a servant of the people, not an inherited tyranny, and that independence was a logical necessity for liberty. Selling an estimated 100,000 to 500,000 copies in a population of about 2.5 million, it shifted public opinion dramatically, proving that appealing to common sense could overthrow entrenched blind faith in monarchical authority. Paine’s pamphlet not only galvanized the Revolution but also exemplified how common sense can challenge and reform societal blind spots.

This article delves deeply into what common sense is, how it operates cognitively and neurologically, and why it must precede blind faith in personal, social, and global contexts. Drawing from psychological research, philosophical discourses, scientific studies, religious perspectives, and neurochemical analyses, we explore the mechanisms behind belief formation and the dangers of unchecked faith. Through historical case studies, modern examples of misinformation, and empirical evidence, we argue that prioritizing common sense fosters better outcomes, reduces cognitive biases, and promotes a more rational society. The discussion will highlight how blind faith can lead to negative consequences, while common sense acts as a safeguard. By the end, readers will appreciate the intricate balance required for informed living, supported by referenced sources.

Defining Common Sense: Historical and Conceptual Foundations

Common sense has been a cornerstone of human thought for millennia, yet its definition remains fluid and context-dependent. Philosophically, it originates from Aristotle’s sensus communis, the internal sense that synthesizes inputs from the five external senses to form a unified perception of reality. This Aristotelian view posits common sense as an innate faculty, essential for practical judgment in ethics and daily life, distinguishing it from abstract reasoning.

In the Enlightenment era, Scottish philosopher Thomas Reid elevated common sense to a philosophical system, arguing it comprises self-evident truths that all rational beings accept, such as the existence of the external world or causation. Reid critiqued skeptics like David Hume, labeling their doubts as “metaphysical lunacies” that contradict everyday experience. For Reid, common sense is universal, providing non-neutral ground for dialogue, even in apologetics.

Psychologically, common sense is our “implicit theory” of mind, enabling us to predict behaviors and emotions without formal analysis. A 2006 book by Carpendale and Müller (How Children Develop Social Understanding) explores its development from infancy, where children begin attributing mental states to others. Research shows it’s not always “common”; cultural variations exist, as noted in a 2024 PNAS (Pediatric Acute-onset Neuropsychiatric Syndrome.) study quantifying it at individual and collective levels through frameworks measuring knowledge and reasoning. This study resolved paradoxes by empirically assessing claims’ commonality, revealing that what seems intuitive varies widely.

In contrast, blind faith is often seen as antithetical. Philosophers like Voltaire argued that faith without reason opposes common sense, making individuals susceptible to manipulation. A 2023 Reddit discussion on consciousness philosophers highlights how “common sense” views differ from laypeople, suggesting expertise refines but doesn’t negate it.

Expanding on definitions, common sense includes heuristics—mental shortcuts—for efficient decisions, like avoiding risks based on patterns. However, as Lilienfeld et al. note, many “commonsense” beliefs are debunked by science, such as “opposites attract” in relationships. This underscores the need for evidence-based refinement.

Historically, Paine’s Common Sense redefined it politically, using plain language to expose absurdities in British rule, like reconciling with a tyrant after Lexington. Its impact was immediate; John Adams credited it with converting public sentiment. Paine’s appeal to “simple facts, plain arguments, and common sense” democratized revolution.

On Cultural Variations

Common sense isn’t universal; a 2024 Northwestern study notes cultural differences, e.g., individualistic vs. collectivist societies prioritize different norms. In education, teaching common sense involves challenging intuitions with evidence.

How Common Sense Works: Cognitive and Neurological Mechanisms

Common sense functions through cognitive processes like pattern recognition and heuristic reasoning. Psychologically, it’s part of “folk psychology,” our everyday theory of mind. Infants develop it early, as shown in machine learning models simulating human-like commonsense.

Neurologically, it involves the prefrontal cortex for executive functions and the parietal lobe for integration. Dopamine reinforces learning from experience, while serotonin modulates emotional responses.

In belief formation, the credition model describes beliefs as neural processes perceiving information. fMRI studies show false belief tasks activate overlapping regions for spontaneous and explicit thinking.

Blind faith bypasses this, relying on emotional rewards; dopamine surges from confirmation create addiction-like adherence.

The Psychology of Blind Faith and Cognitive Biases

The psychology behind blind faith reveals a complex interplay of mental shortcuts, emotional needs, and evolutionary adaptations that can lead individuals to accept beliefs without scrutiny. Blind faith, often characterized as unwavering belief in the absence of evidence or despite contradictory evidence, is deeply intertwined with cognitive biases—systematic errors in thinking that affect judgments and decisions. These biases serve as mental heuristics, evolved to help our ancestors make quick decisions in uncertain environments, but they can also perpetuate irrational beliefs in modern contexts.

One prominent bias linked to blind faith is confirmation bias, where individuals favor information that confirms their preexisting beliefs while ignoring or discounting disconfirming evidence. A 2023 study published in Cognitive Psychology explored how this bias reinforces religious and paranormal beliefs, finding that participants exposed to ambiguous stimuli interpreted them in ways that aligned with their faith, effectively blinding them to alternative explanations. For instance, believers in divine intervention might attribute a medical recovery to prayer rather than medical treatment, selectively recalling supportive anecdotes while dismissing statistical data on natural remission rates.

Another key bias is the availability heuristic, where people judge the likelihood of events based on how easily examples come to mind. This can amplify blind faith in supernatural phenomena; vivid stories of miracles or answered prayers, shared in religious communities, make such events seem more probable than they are. Research from the University of British Columbia in 2013 demonstrated that cognitive biases like this explain not only religious belief but also paranormal and conspiracy beliefs, predisposing human minds toward accepting unverified claims. The study involved surveys and experiments showing that intuitive thinking styles correlate with higher endorsement of such beliefs, as analytical thinking requires effort that many avoid in favor of emotional comfort.

Cognitive dissonance also plays a role, where conflicting beliefs create psychological discomfort, prompting individuals to rationalize or deny evidence to maintain faith. Leon Festinger’s classic 1956 theory was tested in religious contexts; a 2024 study in the Journal of Experimental Social Psychology examined how devout individuals resolve dissonance when faced with scientific contradictions, such as evolution versus creationism. Participants often doubled down on faith, altering their interpretation of facts to reduce tension, illustrating how blind faith acts as a psychological buffer.

From an evolutionary psychology perspective, blind faith may have adaptive value. Group cohesion in early human societies benefited from shared beliefs, fostering trust and cooperation. A 2021 analysis in Frontiers in Psychology linked cognitive styles to religious belief, suggesting that intuitive, holistic thinking promotes faith, while analytical thinking challenges it. This duality explains why blind faith persists: it satisfies emotional needs for certainty and belonging, but at the cost of rational inquiry.

Psychological research also highlights the “bias blind spot,” where people recognize biases in others but not themselves. A UC Merced study in 2024 found that individuals performing good deeds are perceived as more religious due to implicit biases linking morality to faith, even if no causal link exists. This perceptual bias reinforces societal blind faith in religious institutions as moral authorities.

In data interpretation, cognitive biases distort objective analysis, as noted in a 2025 University of Pennsylvania study on how human psychology impacts data handling. Blind testing mitigates this, but in faith-based contexts, lack of such safeguards allows biases to flourish. For example, in pseudoscience like astrology, believers exhibit the Barnum effect, accepting vague statements as personally accurate.

Overall, these biases make blind faith psychologically appealing but intellectually limiting. Studies consistently show that fostering critical thinking education reduces susceptibility, promoting common sense as a counterbalance. By understanding these mechanisms, individuals can cultivate awareness, questioning faith-based claims with evidence-based reasoning to avoid manipulation and foster personal growth.

Research on individual differences shows lower bias susceptibility with strong common sense. In forensics, bias awareness improves accuracy.

Why Prioritize Common Sense Over Blind Faith

Blind faith leads to errors; common sense demands evidence, reducing risks. Historical examples include witch hunts; modern ones, vaccine misinformation.

Prioritizing common sense over blind faith is essential for informed decision-making, societal progress, and personal well-being, as it grounds beliefs in observable evidence and practical reasoning rather than unverified assumptions. Common sense, as practical judgment from experience, allows for adaptability and error correction, while blind faith can lead to stagnation, exploitation, and harm. Historical and contemporary examples, supported by studies, underscore this imperative.

One compelling reason is vulnerability to manipulation. Blind faith in authority figures or ideologies can enable scams, cults, or political extremism. The Jonestown massacre of 1978, where over 900 people died following Jim Jones’ directives, exemplifies how unquestioning obedience overrides common sense, leading to tragedy. A 2025 Facebook discussion on commonsense versus blind faith highlighted how evolution favors learning from causality, yet blind adherence shuts down this process.

Studies show that evidence-based beliefs yield better outcomes. A 2011 NBC News article discussed how common sense and hindsight can blind us to futures if not critically applied, but when prioritized, they enable foresight. In legal contexts, a Seattle University Law Review paper analyzed blind faith in the rule of law, finding that unquestioned conventions limit behavioral flexibility, whereas common sense allows nuanced application.

In science, prioritizing common sense counters pseudoscience. Richard Lewontin’s admission that scientists accept claims against common sense for materialism illustrates the tension, but empirical validation prevails. A 2022 Christian apologetics blog argued that Christianity isn’t blind faith but reasoned, yet critics note many religious claims lack evidence, making common sense crucial for discernment.

Socially, blind faith exacerbates inequality. Policies ignoring religious diversity, as in a 2020 Music Educators Journal article, lead to anti-democratic outcomes, while common sense promotes pluralism. In education, a 2023 Wiley study found that viewing human development as “just common sense” correlates with poorer academic performance, emphasizing the need for evidence over intuition.

Modern examples include vaccine hesitancy during COVID-19, where blind faith in misinformation overrode scientific consensus, causing preventable deaths. Prioritizing common sense—verifying sources and data—saves lives.

Ultimately, common sense empowers autonomy, while blind faith risks dependency. As Seneca noted, wise people see religion’s falsity where commoners accept it blindly. By choosing evidence, we advance collectively.

Studies show misinformation spreads via social media, countered by media literacy.

Case studies: Jonestown massacre from cult faith; financial scams from blind trust.

Philosophical Perspectives

Aristotle: common sense as ethical mean. Kant: reason over faith. Reid vs. idealism.

Philosophical debates on common sense versus blind faith span centuries, contrasting rational inquiry with unquestioned belief. Common sense, as practical reason, is championed as foundational to knowledge, while blind faith is critiqued as irrational or manipulative.

Thomas Reid’s 18th-century common sense philosophy posited it as self-evident truths, universal and non-neutral ground for apologetics against skepticism. Reid argued that blind faith in idealism contradicts everyday experience, advocating common sense as a bulwark.

David Hume’s skepticism challenged common sense, but Reid countered that doubts lead to “metaphysical lunacies.” In modern terms, Bernardo Kastrup’s 2017 essay on idealism versus common sense noted that idealism seems implausible because it defies intuitive realism.

Voltaire and Seneca viewed religion as false to the wise, true to the common, and useful to rulers, implying blind faith serves control. A 2023 Reddit thread on consciousness philosophers showed experts’ views diverge from lay “common sense,” suggesting philosophy refines intuition.

David Ray Griffin integrated common sense with theism, arguing belief in God aligns with it, not blind faith. However, critics like Richard Dawkins emphasize evidence over belief.

Balancing extremes, a 2011 Air Force commentary advocated moderation: blind faith for trust, skepticism for verification. Philosophically, common sense fosters ethical living, as per Aristotle, over faith’s potential dogmatism.

Religious Views

Religions vary in reconciling faith with reason and common sense, some seeing them as complementary, others as opposed.

Christianity often views faith and reason as allies; Isaiah 1:18 invites reasoning with God. Thomas Aquinas argued reason supports faith, while Tertullian saw them in tension. Modern apologists like Corey Sleep posit all rational belief presumes faith as trust.

In Islam, faith (iman) is reasoned; the Quran encourages reflection on creation. However, some traditions emphasize submission over questioning.

Buddhism promotes empirical verification; the Kalama Sutta advises testing teachings against experience, prioritizing common sense.

Critics argue religious faith is blind, lacking evidence. A 2021 Pew Forum transcript explored neuroscience’s role, but religiously, faith transcends reason for many.

Tolerance in dense coexistence relies on common sense, as a 2024 MDPI study noted. Religions caution against blind faith as “mistaken enthusiasm.”

Scientific Studies

Scientific research often tests “common sense” against data, revealing when intuition fails or succeeds, and contrasts it with blind faith’s lack of empiricism.

A 2023 Reddit post on social sciences found common sense predicts replicability, but fields like gender studies sometimes lack it. Dallas Willard’s essay equated blind science and faith as unexamined edicts for most.

In psychology, a 2016 Al-Andalus Academy piece critiqued modern blind faith in science by non-experts. Quora discussions attribute blind beliefs to cognitive limitations, irreconcilable with science’s quest for knowledge.

Studies on hindsight bias show common sense can mislead, but empirical methods correct it. In creationism debates, Apologetics Press notes scientists’ anti-common sense stances for materialism.

AI research models common sense for better reasoning, highlighting its scientific value.

Neurochemistry of Belief

Dopamine rewards faith; neuroplasticity allows change. Placebo effects show belief’s power.

The neurochemistry of belief involves brain chemicals like dopamine and serotonin, explaining why blind faith feels rewarding and resistant to change.

Neurotheology studies show religious experiences activate prefrontal cortex and dopamine pathways, providing pleasure similar to rewards. A 2025 Frontiers article linked belief significance to prefrontal and dopaminergic circuits.

Dopamine reinforces faith; surges from confirmation create addiction-like loops. Serotonin modulates mood, sustaining beliefs under challenge.

fMRI research shows belief formation enlarges parietal and medial frontal areas evolutionarily. Genetic factors may predispose religiosity via brain chemistry.

Placebo effects demonstrate belief’s power to alter physiology. ISSR statements note neuroscience explains but doesn’t disprove faith.

Modern Applications and Case Studies

Misinformation in elections; AI-generated fakes. Common Sense Media fights kid-targeted disinfo.

Negative outcomes: Religious refusals of medicine. AI blind faith horrors.

In modern society, common sense versus blind faith manifests in AI, politics, and health.

A 2025 ACM study on AI-generated religious content showed users’ blind faith in outputs, despite inaccuracies. Arvind Mehrotra’s Medium post warned of algorithmic dogma eroding critical thinking.

Case: QAnon, where blind faith in conspiracies led to January 6 insurrection, overriding evidence.

In tech, LinkedIn’s Ray Dalio noted computers lack common sense, requiring human oversight. Policy Options discussed digital privacy, advocating common sense over blind trust in tech.

Health: Anti-vax movements exemplify blind faith’s dangers; common sense via science saves lives.

Education: Psychology Today critiqued “common sense” as flawed without research

Conclusion

Common sense, as Paine demonstrated, empowers change. Prioritizing it over blind faith leads to enlightened decisions.

In synthesizing these perspectives, common sense emerges as the rational anchor against blind faith’s pitfalls. From Paine’s revolutionary call to modern neurochemical insights, prioritizing evidence fosters progress. While faith offers comfort, unchecked it risks harm; balanced with reason, it enriches life. Embracing common sense empowers us to navigate complexities wisely.

References

1. Common-sense psychology – Harvard University
2. The Problem With Common Sense | Psychology Today
3. The development of commonsense psychology. – APA PsycNet
4. Psychological Bias Links Good Deeds with Religious Belief, UC … – https://news.ucmerced.edu/news/2024/psychological-bias-links-good-deeds-religious-belief-uc-merced-research-says
5. By Study and Faith – Episode 6: Cognitive Biases | FAIR – https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/blog/2023/09/03/by-study-and-faith-episode-6-cognitive-biases
6. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal … – PubMed – https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23974049/
7. Cognitive bias and data: how human psychology impacts data … – https://lpsonline.sas.upenn.edu/features/cognitive-bias-and-data-how-human-psychology-impacts-data-interpretation
8. Cognitive bias and religious beliefs – The BioLogos Forum – https://discourse.biologos.org/t/cognitive-bias-and-religious-beliefs/45605
9. Cognitive styles and religion – ScienceDirect.com – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2352250X20301950
10. [PDF] Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and … – https://www2.psych.ubc.ca/~ara/Manuscripts/Willard_Norenzayan_Cognitive_Biases.pdf
11. The role of cognitive biases in shaping irrational beliefs – https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13546783.2024.2421367
12. Cognitive Biases and Religious Belief: A Path Model Replication in … – https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1948550619841629
13. An analysis based on the cognitive science of religion – http://www.scielo.org.za/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0259-94222020000100017
14. Commonsense and Critical Thinking vs Blind Faith and Obedience – https://www.facebook.com/groups/573281328185475/posts/1053529793493957/
15. The Problem of Blind Faith – Reasons for God – https://reasonsforgod.org/the-problem-of-blind-faith/
16. Why do you choose religious belief (faith) over common sense … – https://www.quora.com/Why-do-you-choose-religious-belief-faith-over-common-sense-reasoning-and-logical-thinking-rationality
17. Blind Science Vs. Blind Faith – Dallas Willard – Renovaré – https://renovare.org/articles/blind-science-vs-blind-faith
18. [PDF] Blind Faith and Reasonable Doubts: Investigating Beliefs in the Rule … – https://digitalcommons.law.seattleu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=&httpsredir=1&article=1685&context=sulr
19. Practices of Tolerance: The Significance of Common Sense in … – https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/15/5/562
20. (PDF) Faith is blind for those without Faith – ResearchGate – https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395768095_Faith_is_blind_for_those_without_Faith
21. Blind Visionaries and Cheese-Eating Sceptics: The Place of Lived … – https://sjdr.se/articles/10.16993/sjdr.1276
22. Blind Faith? User Preference and Expert Assessment of AI … – https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3715275.3732162
23. Religion-Blind Policies: Anti-Democratic Consequences – ACT – https://act.maydaygroup.org/volume-20-issue-2/religion-blind-policies-anti-democratic-consequences/
24. Commonsense and Critical Thinking vs Blind Faith and Obedience – https://www.facebook.com/groups/573281328185475/posts/1053529793493957/
25. Why do you choose religious belief (faith) over common sense … – https://www.quora.com/Why-do-you-choose-religious-belief-faith-over-common-sense-reasoning-and-logical-thinking-rationality
26. Philosophers of consciousness have very different ‘common sense … – https://www.reddit.com/r/consciousness/comments/1gbw120/philosophers_of_consciousness_have_very_different/
27. A logical demonstration that Faith is not blind and is necessary (8.5 … – https://www.reddit.com/r/philosophy/comments/11dapny/a_logical_demonstration_that_faith_is_not_blind/
28. Finding balance – blind faith, skepticism have their place at right time … – https://www.edwards.af.mil/News/Commentaries/Display/Article/396661/finding-balance-blind-faith-skepticism-have-their-place-at-right-time-in-modera/
29. It’s not blind faith, it’s logical reasoning and common sense. – https://www.facebook.com/groups/378789228969685/posts/2970951893086726/
30. GUEST ESSAY: Idealism vs. Common Sense – https://www.bernardokastrup.com/2017/07/idealism-vs-common-sense.html
31. Thomas Reid’s Common Sense Philosophy Part 5 – The Heidelblog – https://heidelblog.net/2023/12/thomas-reids-common-sense-philosophy-part-5-the-implications-for-doing-apologetics/
32. The Ground Beneath our Feet: David Ray Griffin on Common … – https://www.openhorizons.org/8203the-ground-beneath-our-feet-david-ray-griffin-on-common-sense-philosophy-8203.html
33. Common Sense And Blind Faith 1. Recovering our faith and free will – https://www.facebook.com/groups/970380996336288/posts/1134764776564575/
34. Faith vs Reason Exploring the Relationship Between Belief and … – https://www.advancethefaithacademy.com/blog/faith-vs-reason-exploring-the-relationship-between-belief-and-evidence
35. Why do you choose religious belief (faith) over common sense … – https://www.quora.com/Why-do-you-choose-religious-belief-faith-over-common-sense-reasoning-and-logical-thinking-rationality
36. [PDF] the classic debate on the relationship between faith and reason … – https://www2.rivier.edu/journal/ROAJ-Spring-2008/J148-Tavani.pdf
37. Religious faith vs common sense and logic – Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/groups/2868049766811283/posts/3716769785272606/
38. Faith and Reason: Friends or Foes? – Corey Sleep – https://coreysleep.net/the-hope-that-i-have-faith-and-reason/
39. Faith and Reason in Christian Perspective: Definitions – https://sharperiron.org/article/faith-and-reason-christian-perspective-definitions
40. Can faith and reason coincide? Or are they objectively opposed? – https://www.reddit.com/r/DebateReligion/comments/53x5a4/can_faith_and_reason_coincide_or_are_they/
41. Common sense | Richard Dawkins Foundation for Reason and … – https://richarddawkins.net/2013/10/common-sense/
42. Faith vs. Reason | Answers in Genesis – https://answersingenesis.org/apologetics/faith-vs-reason/?srsltid=AfmBOoruqjoG9PyZJoBgF9CH5JKMKXfDQrvvwvxntjnEX1N_fULOS-U6
43. Blind Science Vs. Blind Faith – Dallas Willard – Renovaré – https://renovare.org/articles/blind-science-vs-blind-faith
44. Is it True Science uses Reason and Christianity only has Blind Faith? – https://christianapologetics.blog/is-it-true-science-uses-reason-and-christianity-only-has-blind-faith/
45. Common sense and hindsight blind us to the future – NBC News – https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/common-sense-hindsight-blind-us-future-flna1c9463364
46. Research finds that “common sense” predicts replicability in … – Reddit – https://www.reddit.com/r/IntellectualDarkWeb/comments/o17c4j/research_finds_that_common_sense_predicts/
47. Modern Culture’s Blind Faith in Science – Al-Andalus Academy – https://alandalusacademy.com/modern-cultures-blind-faith-in-science/
48. Commonsense and Critical Thinking vs Blind Faith and Obedience – https://www.facebook.com/groups/573281328185475/posts/1053529793493957/
49. “Unlike Naturalists, You Creationists Have a Blind Faith … – https://apologeticspress.org/unlike-naturalists-you-creationists-have-a-blind-faith-4704/
50. What are the scientific reasons for blind beliefs? – Quora – https://www.quora.com/What-are-the-scientific-reasons-for-blind-beliefs
51. Finding balance – blind faith, skepticism have their place at right time … – https://www.edwards.af.mil/News/Commentaries/Display/Article/396661/finding-balance-blind-faith-skepticism-have-their-place-at-right-time-in-modera/
52. Lessons from the field: Isn’t it just common sense? Naïve realism as … – https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12967
53. Neurotheology: The relationship between brain and religion – PMC – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3968360/
54. Neuroscience of religion – Wikipedia – https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuroscience_of_religion
55. A review of the neuroscience of religion: an overview of the field, its … – https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/neuroscience/articles/10.3389/fnins.2025.1587794/full
56. Neurotheology: Are We Hardwired for God? – Psychiatric Times – https://www.psychiatrictimes.com/view/neurotheology-are-we-hardwired-god
57. The Neurological Origins of Religious Belief – Big Think – https://bigthink.com/surprising-science/the-neurological-origins-of-religious-belief/
58. The biochemistry of belief – PMC – PubMed Central – NIH – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2802367/
59. What Brain Science Tells Us About Religious Belief – https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2008/05/05/what-brain-science-tells-us-about-religious-belief/
60. Belief formation – A driving force for brain evolution – ScienceDirect – https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262619303860
61. Neuroscience and Religious Faith – International Society for Science … – https://www.issr.org.uk/issr-statements/neuroscience-religious-faith/
62. The Believing Brain: Evolution, Neuroscience, and the Spiritual Instinct – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p0_-7FmrDq8
63. Blind Science Vs. Blind Faith – Dallas Willard – Renovaré – https://renovare.org/articles/blind-science-vs-blind-faith
64. Modern Culture’s Blind Faith in Science – Al-Andalus Academy – https://alandalusacademy.com/modern-cultures-blind-faith-in-science/
65. CMV: Beliefs should be based on evidence rather than blind faith – https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/79xkgg/cmv_beliefs_should_be_based_on_evidence_rather/
66. Rationality vs Blind Faith in Modern Society – Facebook – https://www.facebook.com/groups/546122302158521/posts/8151858198251522/
67. Is it better to have blind faith or to question and seek answers before … – https://www.quora.com/Is-it-better-to-have-blind-faith-or-to-question-and-seek-answers-before-coming-to-a-belief
68. The New Digital Dogma: How Blind Faith in Algorithms Erodes Our … – https://arvind-mehrotra.medium.com/the-new-digital-dogma-how-blind-faith-in-algorithms-erodes-our-future-2818161cf37e
69. Blind Faith – Policy Options – https://policyoptions.irpp.org/2014/01/blind-faith/
70. The Problem With Common Sense | Psychology Today – https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/thoughts-on-thinking/202309/the-problem-with-common-sense
71. Blind Faith: All the Way Down. A Review of one Chapter in Still … – https://randalrauser.com/2018/08/blind-faith-all-the-way-down-a-review-of-one-chapter-in-still-unbelievable/
72. Remember that computers have no common sense. | Ray Dalio – https://www.linkedin.com/posts/raydalio_principleoftheday-activity-7262158166648401922-4dFM