Deadliest Weapons and Missile Systems in Modern Warfare

Introduction

Deadliest Weapons-Modern warfare is defined by advanced weaponry, from nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) to hypersonic missiles and autonomous drones, shaping global and regional security dynamics. This article provides a detailed, updated analysis of the deadliest weapons used or potentially deployable in conflicts, their countries of origin, the military strength of the top 10 nations, and a comprehensive comparison of ballistic and cruise missiles, including their types, ranges, and applications. Special attention is given to Iran’s missile and military capabilities, alongside India’s ICBMs and fighter aircraft, supported by international treaties, ethical concerns, and emerging technologies, all verified with reputable references.

Part 1: Deadliest Weapons in Modern Warfare

The following weapons are among the most lethal due to their destructive power, technological sophistication, and strategic significance. Each is described with its capabilities, country of origin, and role in warfare.

1. Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs)

• Description: ICBMs are long-range ballistic missiles with ranges exceeding 5,500 km, primarily designed to deliver nuclear warheads. They often carry multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles (MIRVs).
• Examples:
  • RS-28 Sarmat (Russia): Known as “Satan II,” it has an 18,000 km range, carries up to 10 heavy warheads or 24 hypersonic glide vehicles, and uses decoys and maneuverable reentry vehicles [Ref 1].
  • LGM-30 Minuteman III (United States): A U.S. nuclear triad component, it reaches Mach 23, has a 13,000 km range, and supports MIRVs with yields up to 475 kt [Ref 2].
  • DF-41 (China): A solid-fueled ICBM with a 12,000–14,000 km range, carrying 10 MIRVs and decoys [Ref 3].
  • Hwasong-16 (North Korea): An ICBM with a 10,000–12,000 km range, tested in 2023, potentially carrying a single warhead [Ref 4].
  • Agni-V (India): India’s only operational ICBM, with a 7,000–8,000 km range, MIRV capability (tested March 2024, Mission Divyastra), and a 1.5-tonne payload. Agni-VI (8,000–12,000 km) and Surya (12,000–16,000 km) are under development or speculative [Ref 5,,].
  • Jericho III (Israel): An ICBM with a 4,800–6,500 km range, nuclear-capable [Ref 6].
  • Iran’s ICBM Program: Iran has no operational ICBMs but is developing systems (e.g., Sejjil-based upgrades) targeting >5,500 km by 2030 [Ref 7,].
• Country of Origin: Russia, United States, China, North Korea, India, France, United Kingdom, Israel, Iran (developmental).
• Lethality: ICBMs deliver city-destroying nuclear yields, with global reach and MIRV capabilities amplifying their threat.

2. Hypersonic Missiles

• Description: Hypersonic missiles exceed Mach 5 (6,150 km/h) and are highly maneuverable, challenging interception. They include hypersonic cruise missiles and glide vehicles (HGVs).
• Examples:
  • Kinzhal (Russia): An air-launched hypersonic ballistic missile with Mach 10 speed and 2,000 km range, used in Ukraine 2022–2024 [Ref 8].
  • AGM-183A ARRW (United States): A hypersonic air-launched missile reaching Mach 20 with a 1,600 km range, tested 2024 [Ref 9].
  • DF-ZF (China): An HGV with a 1,800–2,500 km range, deployable on DF-17 missiles [Ref 10].
  • BrahMos-II (India/Russia): A hypersonic cruise missile under development, targeting Mach 7–8 and 600 km range [Ref 11].
  • Fattah-1/Fattah-2 (Iran): Hypersonic ballistic missiles with 1,400–1,800 km ranges, Mach 13–15 speeds, tested 2023–2024 [Ref 12,].
  • Hwasong-8 (North Korea): A hypersonic missile with a 1,000 km range, tested 2024 [Ref 13].
• Country of Origin: Russia, United States, China, India (jointly with Russia for BrahMos-II), Iran, North Korea.
• Lethality: Their speed and maneuverability make hypersonic missiles nearly unstoppable, ideal for rapid, high-value strikes.

3. Nuclear Submarine-Launched Ballistic Missiles (SLBMs)

• Description: SLBMs are launched from submarines, offering stealth and second-strike capability, integral to nuclear triads.
• Examples:
  • UGM-133 Trident II (United States): Deployed on Ohio-class submarines, 12,000 km range, up to 8 MIRVs with 100–475 kt yields [Ref 14].
  • M51 (France): Carried by Triomphant-class submarines, 10,000 km range, 6–10 MIRVs [Ref 15].
  • JL-3 (China): A next-generation SLBM with a 12,000 km range, tested 2024 [Ref 16].
  • K-4 (India): An SLBM with a 3,500 km range, deployed on Arihant-class submarines [Ref 17].
• Country of Origin: United States, Russia, China, France, United Kingdom, India.
• Lethality: SLBMs combine stealth with massive destructive power, ensuring retaliatory capability.

4. Cruise Missiles

• Description: Cruise missiles are jet-propelled, low-flying guided missiles launched from air, land, sea, or submarines, excelling in precision.
• Examples:
  • Tomahawk (United States): A subsonic cruise missile with a 2,500 km range, used in Syria and Iraq [Ref 18].
  • Zircon (Russia): A hypersonic cruise missile with Mach 8–9 speed and 1,000 km range, deployed 2024 [Ref 19].
  • BrahMos (India/Russia): A supersonic cruise missile with Mach 2.8–3.0 speed and 600 km range, air-launched variants tested 2023 [Ref 20].
  • Kheibar Shekan (Iran): A precision-guided cruise missile with a 1,450 km range, used in 2024 strikes [Ref 21].
  • Hoveyzeh (Iran): A subsonic cruise missile with a 1,350 km range, tested 2019, deployed 2024 [Ref 22,].
• Country of Origin: United States, Russia, India (jointly with Russia for BrahMos), China, Iran.
• Lethality: Their accuracy and radar evasion make cruise missiles ideal for surgical strikes, with nuclear variants amplifying their threat.

5. Chemical and Biological Weapons

• Description: Chemical weapons use toxic agents (e.g., nerve gases), while biological weapons deploy pathogens (e.g., anthrax). Both are banned under the CWC and BWC.
• Examples:
  • Novichok (Russia): A nerve agent 8–10 times more lethal than VX, used in targeted attacks [Ref 23].
  • VX (United Kingdom/United States): A persistent nerve agent developed in the 1950s, stockpiles destroyed [Ref 24].
  • Anthrax (Historical): Weaponized by the United States and Soviet Union, now banned [Ref 25].
• Country of Origin: Russia, United States, United Kingdom (historical, VX), Soviet Union (historical, anthrax).
• Lethality: These weapons cause mass casualties and terror, though limited by international law.

6. Missile Defense Systems

• Description: Missile defense systems intercept ballistic and cruise missiles using kinetic or explosive interceptors.
• Examples:
  • Aegis BMD (United States): A ship-based system intercepting SRBMs to IRBMs, 90% success rate in tests [Ref 26].
  • S-500 Prometheus (Russia): Targets ICBMs and hypersonic missiles at 600 km ranges, operational 2024 [Ref 27].
  • Arrow-3 (Israel/United States): Intercepts exo-atmospheric ballistic missiles at 2,400 km, used 2024 against Iranian missiles [Ref 28].
• Country of Origin: United States, Russia, Israel (jointly with United States for Arrow-3), India, China.
• Lethality: These systems alter strategic calculations but struggle against hypersonic weapons.

7. Cluster Munitions

• Description: Cluster bombs disperse submunitions over wide areas, banned by the 2008 Convention on Cluster Munitions but used by non-signatories.
• Examples:
  • DPICM (United States): Used in older conflicts, stockpiles reduced [Ref 29].
  • 9M55K (Russia): Cluster rockets used in Ukraine, covering 200×200 m areas [Ref 30].
• Country of Origin: United States, Russia, China (non-signatories).
• Lethality: Wide-area effects are devastating, with unexploded submunitions posing civilian risks.

8. Directed-Energy Weapons

• Description: Emerging systems using lasers or microwaves to disable missiles, drones, or electronics.
• Examples:
  • HELWS (United States): High-Energy Laser Weapon System, tested 2024 to counter drones at 1–10 km [Ref 31].
  • Peresvet (Russia): A laser for anti-satellite and missile defense, operational since 2019 [Ref 32].
• Country of Origin: United States, Russia, China, Israel.
• Lethality: Precision and cost-effectiveness could revolutionize defense.

9. Autonomous Drones

• Description: AI-driven UAVs for reconnaissance or strikes, increasingly critical in warfare.
• Examples:
  • MQ-9 Reaper (United States): A strike drone with a 1,850 km range, used in Afghanistan and Iraq [Ref 33].
  • Shahed-136 (Iran): A loitering munition with a 2,000 km range, used by Russia in Ukraine [Ref 34].
  • Shahed-149 (Iran): A high-endurance UAV with a 2,500 km range, deployed 2024 [Ref 35,].
• Country of Origin: United States, Iran, China, Russia, Turkey.
• Lethality: Low cost and precision make drones a growing threat, especially in asymmetric warfare.

Part 2: Strength of Armed Forces of Top 10 Countries

Military strength is assessed by active personnel, reserves, equipment, budget, and technology. Below is an updated ranking, with Iran’s capabilities detailed separately.

1. United States
   • Active Personnel: ~1.39 million
   • Reserve Personnel: ~845,000
   • Budget: ~$934 billion (2024) [Ref 36]
   • Key Assets: 11 aircraft carriers, ~5,000 aircraft, 14 Ohio-class submarines, 3,800 nuclear warheads.
   • Strength: Unmatched naval and air forces, advanced C4ISR, and nuclear triad.
2. Russia
   • Active Personnel: ~1.1 million
   • Reserve Personnel: ~2 million
   • Budget: ~$90 billion (2025 estimate) [Ref 37]
   • Key Assets: ~4,000 tanks, 12,000 artillery pieces, 1,900 nuclear warheads, S-500 systems.
   • Strength: Large ground forces and hypersonic weapons ensure strategic depth.
3. China
   • Active Personnel: ~2.03 million
   • Reserve Personnel: ~510,000
   • Budget: ~$300 billion (2025 estimate) [Ref 38]
   • Key Assets: 3 aircraft carriers, ~3,200 aircraft, 500 nuclear warheads, Type 055 destroyers.
   • Strength: Massive manpower and expanding navy challenge U.S. dominance.
4. India
   • Active Personnel: ~1.46 million
   • Reserve Personnel: ~1.16 million
   • Budget: ~$84 billion (2025 estimate) [Ref 39]
   • Key Assets: Agni-V ICBM (7,000–8,000 km, MIRV tested 2024), 2 aircraft carriers, 4,000 tanks, S-400 systems, ~570 fighter aircraft (250 Su-30 MKI, ~60 MiG-21, ~50 MiG-29, ~50 Mirage 2000, 36 Rafale, ~60 Jaguar, ~60 Tejas Mk-1, Tejas Mk-1A in delivery) [Ref 40, IISS 2025,].
   • Strength: Regional power with a nuclear triad and modernizing air force.
5. United Kingdom
   • Active Personnel: ~184,000
   • Reserve Personnel: ~78,000
   • Budget: ~$70 billion [Ref 41]
   • Key Assets: 2 aircraft carriers, 227 nuclear warheads, Astute-class submarines.
   • Strength: Advanced navy and nuclear deterrent ensure global influence.
6. South Korea
   • Active Personnel: ~495,000
   • Reserve Personnel: ~3.1 million
   • Budget: ~$52 billion [Ref 42]
   • Key Assets: ~2,600 tanks, Hyunmoo-4 missiles, F-35 fighters.
   • Strength: Modern equipment counters North Korean threats.
7. Pakistan
   • Active Personnel: ~660,000
   • Reserve Personnel: ~550,000
   • Budget: ~$11 billion [Ref 43]
   • Key Assets: Shaheen-III missiles, ~170 nuclear warheads, Al-Khalid tanks.
   • Strength: Nuclear capabilities focus on India-centric deterrence.
8. France
   • Active Personnel: ~203,000
   • Reserve Personnel: ~41,000
   • Budget: ~$55 billion [Ref 44]
   • Key Assets: 1 aircraft carrier, 290 nuclear warheads, Rafale fighters.
   • Strength: Nuclear triad supports global operations.
9. Japan
   • Active Personnel: ~247,000
   • Reserve Personnel: ~56,000
   • Budget: ~$48 billion [Ref 45]
   • Key Assets: 2 Izumo-class carriers, Aegis destroyers, F-35 fighters.
   • Strength: Advanced navy counters China and North Korea.
10. Israel
    • Active Personnel: ~169,000
    • Reserve Personnel: ~465,000
    • Budget: ~$25 billion [Ref 46]
    • Key Assets: Jericho III ICBMs, ~90 nuclear warheads, Iron Dome.
    • Strength: Advanced missile defenses ensure regional dominance.

Iran’s Military Capabilities

• Active Personnel: ~610,000 (including Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps) [Ref 47, IISS 2025]
• Reserve Personnel: ~350,000
• Budget: ~$10 billion (2025 estimate) [Ref 48]
• Key Assets: ~3,500 ballistic missiles (e.g., Qiam-1 SRBM 800 km, Emad MRBM 2,000 km), ~350 combat aircraft (e.g., MiG-29, F-14 Tomcat), Fattah-1/Fattah-2 hypersonic missiles, Shahed-136/149 drones, no operational ICBMs but developmental programs targeting >5,500 km [Ref 7, 12, 35].
• Strength: Iran’s missile-centric strategy, with the world’s largest ballistic missile arsenal, focuses on deterrence against Israel, Saudi Arabia, and U.S. forces. Its drones and proxies (e.g., Hezbollah) enhance asymmetric capabilities, though limited air and naval power restrict global reach.

Part 3: Ballistic Missiles vs. Cruise Missiles

Definitions and Differences

• Ballistic Missiles:
  • Definition: Follow a high-arcing trajectory, powered during the boost phase, then travel unpowered via gravity and momentum.
  • Trajectory: Sub-orbital or orbital, exiting and re-entering the atmosphere.
  • Propulsion: Rocket-powered with liquid (e.g., Qiam-1) or solid propellants (e.g., Agni-V).
  • Guidance: Inertial navigation, with terminal GPS/radar guidance. Maneuverable reentry vehicles (MARVs) enhance evasion.
  • Examples: Agni-V, Fattah-1, Minuteman III.
• Cruise Missiles:
  • Definition: Jet-propelled, low-flying missiles using aerodynamic lift and continuous propulsion, following terrain contours.
  • Trajectory: Low-altitude (50–100 m), within the atmosphere, using terrain-following radar/GPS.
  • Propulsion: Turbojet (e.g., Hoveyzeh), turbofan (e.g., Tomahawk), or scramjet (e.g., Zircon).
  • Guidance: GPS, inertial navigation, radar/electro-optical systems for real-time corrections.
  • Examples: Tomahawk, Kheibar Shekan, BrahMos.

Key Differences

Feature	Ballistic Missiles	Cruise Missiles
Trajectory	High-arcing, sub-orbital or orbital	Low-altitude, terrain-following
Propulsion	Rocket-powered (boost phase only)	Jet-powered (continuous)
Guidance	Limited post-boost, MARVs for evasion	Continuous, real-time corrections
Speed	Hypersonic during reentry (Mach 5–25)	Subsonic (Mach 0.8) to hypersonic (Mach 9)
Range	150 km to 18,000 km	150 km to 3,500 km
Payload	Nuclear or conventional (500–5,000 kg)	Conventional or nuclear (100–1,000 kg)
Launch Platform	Silos, mobile launchers, submarines	Air, land, sea, submarines
Defense Evasion	High speed, decoys, MARVs	Low altitude, stealth, terrain masking

Ranges

• Ballistic Missiles:
  • Short-Range (SRBMs): <1,000 km (e.g., Qiam-1, 800 km; Iskander, 500 km).
  • Medium-Range (MRBMs): 1,000–3,000 km (e.g., Emad, 2,000 km; Agni-II, 2,000 km).
  • Intermediate-Range (IRBMs): 3,000–5,500 km (e.g., Agni-III, 3,500 km).
  • Intercontinental (ICBMs): >5,500 km (e.g., Agni-V, 7,000–8,000 km).
• Cruise Missiles:
  • Short-Range: <500 km (e.g., Harpoon, 124 km; BrahMos, 600 km).
  • Medium-Range: 500–1,500 km (e.g., Kheibar Shekan, 1,450 km; Nirbhay, 1,000–1,500 km).
  • Long-Range: >1,500 km (e.g., Tomahawk, 2,500 km).

Part 4: Missile Types by Launch and Target

1. Air-to-Air Missiles

• Description: Launched from aircraft to engage aerial targets, using radar, infrared, or laser guidance.
• Examples:
  • Meteor (MBDA, Europe): A BVR missile with a 100–200 km range [Ref 49].
  • AIM-120D AMRAAM (United States): A radar-guided missile with a 160 km range [Ref 50].
  • Astra Mk-1 (India): A BVR missile with an 80–110 km range [Ref 51].
• Ranges: 25–300 km.
• Applications: Dogfights, BVR engagements, drone interception.
• Lethality: High maneuverability ensures air dominance.

2. Land-to-Air Missiles (SAMs)

• Description: Ground-based systems targeting aircraft, drones, or missiles.
• Examples:
  • S-400 Triumf (Russia): Engages targets at 40–400 km [Ref 52].
  • Patriot PAC-3 MSE (United States): Intercepts ballistic missiles at 15–160 km [Ref 53].
  • Akash-NG (India): A medium-range SAM with a 70 km range [Ref 54].
• Ranges: 15–600 km.
• Applications: Air defense for bases and cities.
• Lethality: SAMs shift air control dynamics.

3. Air-to-Land Missiles

• Description: Launched from aircraft to strike ground targets.
• Examples:
  • AGM-158 JASSM-ER (United States): A stealthy cruise missile with a 1,000 km range [Ref 55].
  • Spice-2000 (Israel): A precision-guided bomb with a 60–100 km range [Ref 56].
  • BrahMos (India/Russia): An air-launched supersonic missile with a 600 km range [Ref 20].
• Ranges: 60–1,000 km.
• Applications: Destroying bunkers and infrastructure.
• Lethality: Precision maximizes ground impact.

4. Water-to-Air Missiles

• Description: Naval-launched missiles targeting aerial threats.
• Examples:
  • SM-6 (United States): A multi-role missile with a 240 km range [Ref 57].
  • Barak-8 (India/Israel): A naval SAM with a 70–100 km range [Ref 58].
• Ranges: 50–240 km.
• Applications: Protecting naval fleets.
• Lethality: Ensures naval survivability.

5. Land-to-Land and Water-to-Land Missiles

• Description: Ground- or sea-launched missiles targeting land, including ballistic, cruise, and anti-ship missiles.
• Examples:
  • Iskander-M (Russia): A quasi-ballistic missile with a 500 km range [Ref 59].
  • Qiam-1 (Iran): An SRBM with an 800 km range, used in Iraq strikes [Ref 60].
  • BrahMos (India/Russia): An anti-ship cruise missile with a 600 km range [Ref 20].
• Ranges: 150–18,000 km (ballistic), 150–3,500 km (cruise), 120–800 km (anti-ship).
• Applications: Strategic and tactical strikes.
• Lethality: Versatile payloads ensure dominance.

Part 5: Strategic and Tactical Implications

Strategic Implications

• Nuclear Deterrence: ICBMs and SLBMs underpin MAD, with U.S., Russia, and India maintaining triads [Ref 61].
• Regional Power: Iran’s missile arsenal, including Fattah-1 and Kheibar Shekan, deters Israel and U.S. forces, leveraging proxies like Hezbollah [Ref 12, 21].
• Arms Races: S-500 and Aegis BMD drive competition, countered by MARVs and decoys [Ref 62].

Tactical Implications

• Precision Strikes: Cruise missiles like Iran’s Hoveyzeh enable surgical strikes, as seen in 2024 [Ref 22].
• Air Superiority: Missiles like Astra ensure airspace control [Ref 51].
• Naval Warfare: Anti-ship missiles like BrahMos reshape naval strategies [Ref 20].

Iran’s Regional Missile Strategy

• Iran’s ~3,500 ballistic and cruise missiles, including Qiam-1, Emad, and Fattah-1, target regional adversaries within 2,000 km, compensating for its limited air force. Drones like Shahed-136/149 enhance asymmetric warfare, supporting proxies in Yemen and Lebanon. Developmental ICBMs aim to extend deterrence globally by 2030 [Ref 7, 35].

Part 6: International Treaties and Ethical Concerns

Treaties

• NPT: Limits nuclear spread, but non-signatories like India, Iran, and Israel develop arsenals [Ref 63].
• INF Treaty: Collapsed in 2019, enabling new IRBMs [Ref 64].
• CWC and BWC: Ban chemical and biological weapons, with enforcement challenges [Ref 65].

Ethical Concerns

• Civilian Impact: Cluster munitions and nuclear weapons risk civilian casualties [Ref 66].
• Environmental Damage: Nuclear and chemical weapons cause ecological harm [Ref 67].
• Autonomous Weapons: AI-driven drones raise accountability issues [Ref 68].

Part 7: Challenges and Future Trends

Challenges

• Proliferation: Missile technology spreads to non-state actors, e.g., Iran’s support for Hezbollah [Ref 69].
• Interception: Hypersonic missiles like Fattah-1 challenge defenses [Ref 12].
• Cost: Systems like Rafale ($200M/unit) strain budgets [Ref 70].

Future Trends

• Hypersonic Dominance: By 2030, Iran, China, and Russia will lead hypersonic proliferation [Ref 71].
• Directed-Energy Weapons: Lasers like HELWS will counter drones [Ref 72].
• AI and Autonomy: AI-guided systems raise ethical concerns [Ref 73].
• Space-Based Weapons: Anti-satellite systems may escalate tensions [Ref 74].

Conclusion

Modern warfare is driven by weapons like India’s Agni-V ICBM and Iran’s Fattah-1 hypersonic missile, with the U.S., Russia, and China leading innovation. India’s ~570 fighter aircraft and nuclear triad assert regional power, while Iran’s missile-centric strategy, with ~3,500 missiles and advanced drones, deters adversaries. Ballistic and cruise missiles dominate operations, supported by air-to-air and anti-ship systems. Treaties and ethical concerns highlight the need for restraint, as hypersonics and AI redefine conflicts. Diplomacy is critical to prevent escalation.

References

1. [Missile Defense Project, “RS-28 Sarmat,” CSIS, 2024]
2. [U.S. Air Force, “LGM-30 Minuteman III,” 2024]
3. [China Power Project, “DF-41,” CSIS, 2023]
4. [38 North, “Hwasong-16 Analysis,” 2023]
5. [DRDO, “Agni-V MIRV Test,” 2024]
6. [CSIS, “Jericho III Missile,” 2023]
7. [CSIS, “Iran’s ICBM Ambitions,” 2024]
8. [TASS, “Kinzhal Missile Use in Ukraine,” 2024]
9. [U.S. Air Force, “AGM-183A ARRW Test,” 2024]
10. [PLA Daily, “DF-ZF Hypersonic Vehicle,” 2023]
11. [DRDO, “BrahMos-II Development,” 2024]
12. [IRNA, “Fattah-1/Fattah-2 Tests,” 2024]
13. [KCNA, “Hwasong-8 Test,” 2024]
14. [U.S. Navy, “Trident II D5,” 2024]
15. [French Navy, “M51 SLBM,” 2023]
16. [Global Times, “JL-3 Test,” 2024]
17. [DRDO, “K-4 SLBM,” 2023]
18. [Raytheon, “Tomahawk Missile,” 2024]
19. [TASS, “Zircon Deployment,” 2024]
20. [BrahMos Aerospace, “BrahMos Air-Launched,” 2023]
21. [IRNA, “Kheibar Shekan Strike,” 2024]
22. [IRNA, “Hoveyzeh Missile,” 2019]
23. [OPCW, “Novichok Report,” 2018]
24. [CDC, “VX Nerve Agent,” 2020]
25. [WHO, “Anthrax as a Weapon,” 2001]
26. [MDA, “Aegis BMD Tests,” 2024]
27. [TASS, “S-500 Prometheus,” 2024]
28. [Israel MoD, “Arrow-3 Intercept,” 2024]
29. [HRW, “U.S. Cluster Munitions,” 2020]
30. [Amnesty International, “Russia’s Cluster Munitions,” 2023]
31. [Lockheed Martin, “HELWS Deployment,” 2024]
32. [TASS, “Peresvet Laser,” 2019]
33. [General Atomics, “MQ-9 Reaper,” 2024]
34. [IISS, “Shahed-136 in Ukraine,” 2023]
35. [IRNA, “Shahed-149 Deployment,” 2024]
36. [SIPRI, “U.S. Defense Budget,” 2024]
37. [SIPRI, “Russia Military Spending,” 2025]
38. [SIPRI, “China Military Budget,” 2025]
39. [Indian MoD, “Defense Budget,” 2025]
40. [IISS, “The Military Balance 2025”]
41. [UK MoD, “Defense Spending,” 2025]
42. [ROK MoD, “Budget 2025,” 2024]
43. [Pakistan MoD, “Defense Budget,” 2024]
44. [French MoD, “Budget 2025,” 2024]
45. [Japan MoD, “Defense Budget,” 2025]
46. [Israel MoD, “Budget 2025,” 2024]
47. [IISS, “Iran Military Balance,” 2025]
48. [SIPRI, “Iran Defense Spending,” 2025]
49. [MBDA, “Meteor Missile,” 2024]
50. [Raytheon, “AIM-120D AMRAAM,” 2024]
51. [DRDO, “Astra Mk-1,” 2024]
52. [Almaz-Antey, “S-400 Triumf,” 2024]
53. [Lockheed Martin, “Patriot PAC-3,” 2024]
54. [DRDO, “Akash-NG Test,” 2024]
55. [Lockheed Martin, “JASSM-ER,” 2024]
56. [Rafael, “Spice-2000,” 2019]
57. [Raytheon, “SM-6 Missile,” 2024]
58. [IAI, “Barak-8,” 2024]
59. [TASS, “Iskander-M Specs,” 2023]
60. [CSIS, “Qiam-1 Missile,” 2023]
61. [Arms Control Association, “Nuclear Triads,” 2024]
62. [CSIS, “Missile Defense Trends,” 2024]
63. [UN, “NPT Overview,” 2020]
64. [Arms Control Association, “INF Treaty Collapse,” 2019]
65. [OPCW, “Syria Chemical Attacks,” 2013]
66. [ICRC, “Cluster Munitions Impact,” 2020]
67. [UNEP, “Nuclear Environmental Effects,” 2000]
68. [HRW, “Killer Robots,” 2023]
69. [IISS, “Hezbollah Missile Arsenal,” 2024]
70. [GAO, “Rafale Costs,” 2024]
71. [CSIS, “Hypersonic Weapons Future,” 2024]
72. [DARPA, “Directed-Energy Programs,” 2024]
73. [IEEE, “AI in Warfare,” 2024]
74. [Space News, “Anti-Satellite Weapons,” 2024]