Genetic Insights into Human Migration from Iran and Central Asia to South Asia: Connections with Rigveda and Avesta Rituals

Introduction

The Indian subcontinent, with its rich tapestry of cultures, languages, and ethnicities, has been shaped by millennia of human migrations. Genetic studies, leveraging ancient and modern DNA, have illuminated the contributions of populations from Iran and Central Asia to South Asia’s genetic diversity. These migrations, occurring primarily during the Neolithic and Bronze Age periods, have left lasting genetic, cultural, and linguistic imprints. Additionally, the striking similarities between the rituals described in the Rigveda (an ancient Indian text) and the Avesta (the sacred text of Zoroastrianism) provide further evidence of shared cultural origins between the Indo-Iranian peoples. This article synthesizes the latest DNA research, explores the extent of migrations from Iran and Central Asia, and examines the cultural and ritualistic connections between the Rigveda and Avesta, offering a comprehensive view of their impact on South Asia.

Historical Context of Migrations

South Asia’s demographic history is a complex interplay of migrations, beginning with the arrival of modern humans from Africa around 70,000–50,000 years ago. Subsequent waves from Iran and Central Asia, particularly during the Neolithic and Bronze Age, have significantly shaped the region’s genetic and cultural landscape. These migrations are associated with the spread of agriculture, the Indo-Aryan migrations, and later historical interactions, such as trade and conquests. The Iranian Plateau and Central Asian steppes, due to their strategic locations, served as conduits for gene flow and cultural exchange, connecting South Asia with West Asia and Eurasia.

Prehistoric Migrations

The earliest populations in South Asia, often referred to as Ancestral South Indians (ASI), were hunter-gatherers whose genetic signatures persist in modern populations, particularly in isolated groups like the Andamanese. However, significant migrations from Iran and Central Asia began during the Neolithic period (circa 10,000–5,000 BCE), associated with the spread of agriculture, and continued into the Bronze Age (circa 3,000–1,500 BCE), marked by the arrival of Indo-Iranian peoples.

Neolithic and Bronze Age Migrations

The Neolithic period saw the spread of farming from the Fertile Crescent, including regions of modern-day Iran. Genetic evidence suggests that Iranian farmers migrated to South Asia around 9,000 years ago, contributing to the genetic makeup of the Indus Valley Civilization (IVC) populations. These migrations introduced agricultural technologies and are reflected in the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and Y-chromosome haplogroups found in modern South Asians.

The Bronze Age brought further migrations from Central Asia, particularly from the Sintashta and Andronovo cultures (circa 2200–1450 BCE), which are considered ancestral to the Indo-Iranians. The Indo-Aryans, a branch of the Indo-Iranians, migrated to South Asia around 2,000 BCE, introducing Indo-European languages and cultural practices documented in the Rigveda. These migrations brought a steppe pastoralist ancestry, which is now a significant component in many South Asian populations, particularly in northern India.

Genetic Evidence of Migration from Iran

Recent genetic studies have provided detailed insights into the contributions of Iranian ancestry to South Asian populations. The Iranian Plateau, encompassing modern-day Iran, Afghanistan, and parts of Pakistan, has been a hub for human migrations since the Paleolithic.

Ancient DNA Findings

A 2025 study published in Nature analyzed 50 ancient DNA samples from nine archaeological sites in Iran, reporting 23 new mitogenomes and 13 nuclear genomes. The study found that an Early Chalcolithic sample from northern Iran showed predominantly Early Neolithic Iranian ancestry, indicating long-term genetic continuity in the Zagros region. This continuity suggests that the Iranian Plateau maintained a relatively stable population with limited external gene flow, except for some western influences during the Neolithic and Bronze Age. The genetic profiles of these samples position them as intermediates on an east-west genetic cline, with strong connections to South-Central Asian Bronze Age populations, including those in the IVC.

A 2019 study published in ScienceDirect analyzed an ancient genome from the Harappan site of Rakhigarhi, revealing that the individual was a mixture of Iranian-related ancestry (the largest component) and Southeast Asian hunter-gatherer ancestry, with no detectable steppe pastoralist ancestry. This suggests that the IVC population was primarily composed of indigenous hunter-gatherers and Iranian farmers, with the latter contributing significantly to the genetic pool. The Iranian ancestry in the IVC is distinct from later Iranian populations, indicating that it derives from a lineage that diverged before the spread of farming across the Iranian Plateau.

Modern DNA Evidence

Modern genetic studies, such as those conducted by the Iranian DNA Project and published in PLOS Genetics, highlight the heterogeneity of Iran’s population, which includes Persian, Azeri, Kurdish, Balochi, and other ethnic groups. These studies show that Iranian populations have a mix of Western Eurasian, South Asian, and limited East Asian and African ancestry. The mtDNA haplogroups HV2 and U7, prevalent in Iran, are also found in South Asia, suggesting ancient gene flow between the two regions. For instance, the HV2a sub-clade, dated to 19–22 kya, is believed to have originated in Iran and spread to India through repeated migrations.

In South Asia, the Iranian farmer ancestry is a major component of the Ancestral North Indian (ANI) population, which forms a significant part of the genetic makeup of modern northern Indians. A 2018 study from Harvard’s Reich Lab proposed that the ANI population resulted from the admixture of Iranian farmers and indigenous South Asian hunter-gatherers, with a later influx of steppe pastoralists around 4,000 years ago. This model is supported by the absence of significant steppe ancestry in early IVC samples, indicating that the Iranian contribution predates the Indo-Aryan migrations.

Genetic Evidence of Migration from Central Asia

Central Asia, particularly the Eurasian steppes, has been a source of significant migrations into South Asia, especially during the Bronze Age. The Sintashta and Andronovo cultures are associated with the Proto-Indo-Iranians, whose descendants include the Indo-Aryans who migrated to South Asia.

Ancient DNA Findings

A 2022 study in Scientific Reports examined the genetic continuity of Indo-Iranian populations in Central Asia, focusing on the Yaghnobi and Tajik populations. The study found that these modern populations display strong genetic continuity with Iron Age samples from Turkmenistan and Tajikistan, with Yaghnobis modeled as a mixture of 93% Iron Age Turkmenistan ancestry and 7% Baikal ancestry. This suggests that Indo-Iranian populations in Central Asia have maintained genetic stability despite multiple migration waves. The study also noted limited gene flow from Iran during the Persian cultural expansion, indicating that the Indo-Iranian genetic component in Central Asia is distinct from later Iranian influences.

In South Asia, the steppe pastoralist ancestry, linked to the Indo-Aryan migrations, is evident in modern populations, particularly among Brahmin and Bhumihar groups. A 2018 paper co-authored by Niraj Rai and David Reich found that the second major migration into South Asia, around 4,000 years ago, involved steppe pastoralists who mixed with the Indus Periphery People (a combination of Iranian farmers and South Asian hunter-gatherers) to form the ANI population. This steppe ancestry is more pronounced in northern India and among groups traditionally associated with Indo-European languages.

Modern DNA Evidence

Modern South Asian populations show a gradient of steppe ancestry, with higher proportions in northern India and among upper-caste groups. The 23andMe Ancestry Composition Report notes that Central Asian ancestry in South Asia is linked to migrations around 4,000 years ago, which brought Indo-European languages and cultural practices. The presence of Y-chromosome haplogroups like R1a-M198, common in Central Asia and northern India, supports this migration. Additionally, mtDNA haplogroups such as U3b3, found in both Iran and Central Asia, indicate maternal gene flow into South Asia.

Quantifying Migration Contributions

Quantifying the exact proportion of Iranian and Central Asian ancestry in modern South Asians is complex due to the admixed nature of the population and regional variations. However, genetic studies provide estimates based on admixture models and ancient DNA comparisons.

Iranian Ancestry

• Indus Valley Civilization: The 2019 Rakhigarhi genome study suggests that the IVC population had approximately 70–80% Iranian-related ancestry, with the remainder from Southeast Asian hunter-gatherers.
• Modern South Asians: The ANI component, which includes Iranian farmer ancestry, constitutes 30–70% of the ancestry in northern Indian populations, with higher proportions among upper-caste groups like Brahmins. In southern India, the ASI component dominates, but Iranian ancestry is still detectable, ranging from 10–30%.
• Mitochondrial DNA: mtDNA haplogroups like HV2 and U7, originating in Iran, are found in 5–20% of South Asian populations, particularly in northern and western India.

Central Asian Ancestry

• Steppe Pastoralist Contribution: The 2018 Reich Lab study estimates that steppe pastoralist ancestry contributes 10–30% to the ANI population, with higher proportions in northern India and among Indo-European-speaking groups. Brahmin and Bhumihar populations may have up to 40% steppe ancestry.
• Y-Chromosome Haplogroups: Haplogroups like R1a-M198, associated with Central Asian steppe populations, are prevalent in 20–50% of northern Indian males.
• Modern Populations: Central Asian ancestry is less pronounced in southern India (5–15%) but significant in northwestern regions like Punjab and Rajasthan (20–40%).

Cultural and Linguistic Impacts

The migrations from Iran and Central Asia profoundly influenced South Asia’s cultural and linguistic diversity. The Iranian farmer migrations are associated with the spread of agricultural practices and possibly Dravidian languages, though the linguistic impact remains debated. The Indo-Aryan migrations introduced Indo-European languages, Vedic culture, and social structures like the caste system, as documented in the Rigveda.

Similarities Between Rigveda and Avesta Rituals

The Rigveda and Avesta, sacred texts of the Indo-Aryans and Iranians, respectively, share remarkable similarities in their rituals, deities, and linguistic features, reflecting their common Indo-Iranian origins. These similarities provide cultural evidence of the shared ancestry of populations migrating from Central Asia and the Iranian Plateau.

Linguistic Connections

The Rigveda, composed in Vedic Sanskrit around 1500–1200 BCE, and the Avesta, written in Avestan, are linguistically close, both belonging to the Indo-Iranian branch of the Indo-European language family. For example:

• The Vedic term soma (a ritual drink) corresponds to the Avestan haoma.
• The Vedic deva (god) parallels the Avestan daeva, though the latter term denotes malevolent beings in Zoroastrianism, reflecting a theological divergence.
• The Vedic yajna (sacrifice) is akin to the Avestan yasna (worship or offering).

These linguistic parallels suggest that the Indo-Aryans and Iranians shared a common cultural and linguistic heritage before their divergence, likely in the Central Asian steppes around 2000 BCE.

Ritualistic Similarities

The rituals described in the Rigveda and Avesta share common elements, reflecting a shared Indo-Iranian ritual tradition:

• Fire Worship: Both texts emphasize the centrality of fire in rituals. In the Rigveda, Agni (the fire god) is a primary deity, invoked in nearly every hymn. The Avesta similarly venerates Atar (fire), considered a sacred element and a medium to connect with Ahura Mazda. The Vedic homam (fire offering) parallels the Avestan yasna ceremony, where offerings are made into a consecrated fire.
• Soma/Haoma Rituals: Both cultures revered a ritual drink, soma in the Rigveda and haoma in the Avesta, prepared from a plant (possibly ephedra) and used in sacrificial ceremonies to invoke divine favor. The preparation and consumption of soma/haoma involve similar rituals, including pressing the plant, mixing it with milk, and offering it to deities.
• Animal Sacrifice: Both texts describe animal sacrifices, particularly of cattle and horses, as offerings to deities. The Vedic ashvamedha (horse sacrifice) finds echoes in Avestan rituals, though less elaborated, where animals were offered to honor divine beings.
• Priestly Roles: The Rigveda describes priests like the hotr (invoker) and adhvaryu (ritual officiant), while the Avesta mentions the zaotar (priest), both performing similar functions in conducting sacrifices and chanting hymns.

Deities and Cosmology

The pantheons of the Rigveda and Avesta share deities with similar attributes:

• Mitra/Mithra: The Vedic Mitra, a god of contracts and friendship, corresponds to the Avestan Mithra, a deity of covenant and light.
• Varuna/Apam Napat: The Vedic Varuna, a god of cosmic order, parallels the Avestan Apam Napat, associated with waters and divine authority.
• Indra/Vrthragna: The Vedic Indra, a warrior god, shares traits with the Avestan Verethragna, a deity of victory.

However, theological differences emerged, particularly in Zoroastrianism’s dualistic framework, where daevas became demonic entities, contrasting with their divine status in the Rigveda. This divergence likely occurred after the Indo-Iranians split, with the Iranians adopting Zoroastrian reforms.

Cultural Implications

The shared rituals and deities suggest that the Indo-Aryans and Iranians originated from a common Proto-Indo-Iranian culture in Central Asia, likely the Sintashta-Andronovo cultural complex. The migrations to South Asia and the Iranian Plateau carried these traditions, which adapted to local contexts. In South Asia, the Vedic culture evolved into the complex rituals and social structures of the Brahmanical tradition, while in Iran, Zoroastrianism reformed earlier practices into a monotheistic framework.

The question of how Central Asian beliefs came to dominate South Asia is complex. A 2017 Business Standard article speculates that nature worship may stem from African migrations, kula deivam (family deity) practices from Iranian migrations, and Vedic yagnas from Central Asian migrations. Genetic evidence suggests that cultural diffusion, rather than large-scale population replacement, played a significant role. The Indo-Aryans likely imposed their language and culture through elite dominance, as their genetic contribution (10–30% steppe ancestry) is relatively small compared to their cultural impact.

Archaeological and Historical Correlates

Archaeological evidence supports the genetic and cultural findings. The IVC (2600–1900 BCE) shows cultural connections with Iranian sites like Shahr-i-Sokhta and Gonur Tepe, indicating trade and migration networks. Similar burial practices, such as catacomb graves, in southeastern Iran and South-Central Asia suggest cultural exchange. The decline of the IVC around 1900 BCE coincides with the arrival of steppe pastoralists, as evidenced by changes in material culture in the Swat Valley and the emergence of the Gandhara Grave culture.

Historical records, such as those by Herodotus, mention nomadic groups like the Scythians and Saka, related to the Indo-Iranian migrations. These groups left genetic and cultural traces in South Asia, particularly in northwestern regions like Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Avesta and Rigveda, composed around the same period, further corroborate these connections through their shared linguistic and ritualistic elements.

Challenges and Limitations

Studying ancient migrations through DNA faces challenges, particularly in South Asia, where warm and humid climates accelerate DNA degradation. The paucity of ancient DNA samples from the IVC limits direct evidence, forcing reliance on modern DNA and outlier samples from neighboring regions. Additionally, the complex admixture history of South Asian populations complicates the disentanglement of specific migration events. The interpretation of Rigveda-Avesta similarities is also debated, as some similarities may result from parallel evolution rather than direct cultural transmission. Future studies with larger aDNA sample sizes and advanced genomic techniques, such as single-cell sequencing, could provide clearer insights.

Conclusion

The latest DNA research reveals that migrations from Iran and Central Asia have significantly shaped South Asia’s genetic and cultural landscape. Iranian farmers contributed 70–80% of the IVC’s ancestry and 30–70% of the ANI population, with mtDNA haplogroups like HV2 and U7 indicating ancient gene flow. Central Asian steppe pastoralists, arriving around 4,000 years ago, contributed 10–40% steppe ancestry, particularly in northern India, and introduced Indo-European languages and Vedic culture. The remarkable similarities between the Rigveda and Avesta, including shared rituals like fire worship and soma/haoma ceremonies, reflect the common Indo-Iranian origins of these populations. These genetic, cultural, and linguistic connections highlight the dynamic history of human movement and cultural exchange in South Asia, underscoring the region’s role as a crossroads of human civilization.

References

• Ancient DNA indicates 3,000 years of genetic continuity in the Northern Iranian Plateau, from the Copper Age to the Sassanid Empire. Nature. 2025.
• Genetic continuity of Indo-Iranian speakers since the Iron Age in southern Central Asia. Scientific Reports. 2022.
• Ancient Migratory Events in the Middle East: New Clues from the Y-Chromosome Variation of Modern Iranians. PMC. 2012.
• Indus Valley people did not have genetic contribution from the steppes: Head of Ancient DNA Lab testing Rakhigarhi samples. The Caravan. 2018.
• An Ancient Harappan Genome Lacks Ancestry from Steppe Pastoralists or Iranian Farmers. ScienceDirect. 2019.
• Complete Mitochondrial DNA Diversity in Iranians. PLOS One. 2013.
• Indian population originated in 3 migration waves from Africa, Iran & Asia. Business Standard. 2017.
• The Rigveda: Historical and Comparative Perspectives. Journal of Indo-European Studies. 2015.
• The Avesta and Zoroastrianism: Ritual and Mythology. Iranica Antiqua. 2018.
• 23andMe Reference Populations & Regions. 23andMe Customer Care. 2023.